A Major Shift in Portuguese Taxation Policy?
A recent decision by the Portuguese Arbitration Court (CAAD) has challenged the way Portugal taxes capital gains for non-residents from blacklisted territories and, therefore, the “Portuguese tax blacklist”. This case, officially titled Case 494/2024-T, dealt explicitly with taxpayers residing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) subject to an increased tax rate of 35% on real estate capital gains—far higher than that of other non-residents.
This ruling marks a significant moment in Portugal’s approach to international taxation, particularly for those living in jurisdictions labelled as “blacklisted.”
Why Was This Taxation Controversial?
The Portuguese tax authorities justified the higher tax rate as an anti-tax avoidance measure. However, the Arbitration Court ruled against it, stating that this practice violates the principle of free movement of capital as outlined in Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
The court’s reasoning was straightforward:
- Automatic Tax Penalties Are Unjustified – Residency in a so-called “blacklisted” jurisdiction alone does not justify harsher taxation.
- Portugal’s Measures Were Disproportionate – Blanket tax policies restricting capital flow go beyond what is necessary to combat tax avoidance.
- Existing Tax Treaty with UAE Undermines Justification – Portugal and the UAE have a tax treaty that includes an exchange of information agreement, making excessive taxation unnecessary.
The Outcome? A Major Win for Taxpayers
The Arbitration Court ultimately annulled the 35% tax rate, ruling that the taxpayers were entitled to a refund with interest on the excess amount paid. This decision challenges the long-standing approach of penalizing individuals based solely on their tax residency.
The Bigger Picture: Portugal’s Outdated Blacklist
Portugal’s “blacklist” of 80 jurisdictions has been heavily criticized for being out of sync with modern international tax policies. Despite global advancements in tax transparency and cooperation, Portugal continues to impose automatic higher tax rates on residents of these jurisdictions—even when a valid tax treaty exists.
This ruling exposes the disconnect between Portugal’s tax policies and international legal principles. While the Arbitration Court ruled in favour of the taxpayers in this case, it raises broader questions about whether Portugal’s tax laws need urgent reform.
What This Means for Investors and Expats
For individuals and businesses investing in Portugal from blacklisted jurisdictions like the UAE or Qatar, this ruling is a positive sign. It demonstrates that Portugal’s courts will intervene when tax policies conflict with EU law.
Interestingly, the Portuguese government has recently been actively promoting investment from countries like the UAE and Qatar despite maintaining outdated tax policies that discourage such investments.
This decision should serve as a wake-up call for policymakers to modernize Portugal’s tax blacklist and align it with today’s international tax transparency standards.
Final Thoughts: Will the Portuguese Tax Blacklist be Adapted?
While this case was decided at the Arbitration Court level and was not referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), it highlights an ongoing issue—when tax legislation lags, the courts enforce fundamental EU and international law principles.
Portugal now faces growing pressure to rethink its tax blacklist and eliminate arbitrary taxation on non-residents. Whether the government will take action remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: this ruling is a significant step toward fairer tax treatment for international investors and expatriates.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the Portuguese tax blacklist?
Portugal maintains a list of 80 jurisdictions it considers “harmful tax practices.” Residents of these jurisdictions often face higher tax rates when earning income in Portugal.
2. What was the key issue in this arbitration case?
The case challenged Portugal’s 35% tax rate on real estate capital gains for UAE residents, arguing that it violated EU free movement of capital rules.
3. Why did the court rule against the Portuguese tax authority?
The Arbitration Court found that Portugal’s taxation measures were disproportionate, unjustified, and inconsistent with the existing Portugal-UAE tax treaty.
4. Will this ruling change tax policy in Portugal?
While the ruling applies specifically to this case, it sets a legal precedent that could pressure Portuguese lawmakers to reform the tax blacklist system.
5. What should investors from blacklisted countries do?
Investors should stay informed about potential tax refunds and legal challenges they can pursue if they face unfair taxation in Portugal.
6. Could the Portuguese tax blacklist be removed or updated?
Given the international push for tax transparency and recent court decisions, Portugal may be forced to revise its outdated blacklist policies shortly.
Read the full decision in Portuguese.
The information in this blog post is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. While we aim to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the content, tax laws and regulations in Portugal are subject to frequent changes, and interpretations may vary based on individual circumstances. Readers are advised to consult with our team before making any decisions based on the information provided in this article. The content herein is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute a client-professional relationship. We disclaim any liability for errors or omissions in this material and any actions made or decisions based on the information provided.
The founding of Madeira Corporate Services dates back to 1995. MCS started as a corporate service provider in the Madeira International Business Center and rapidly became a leading management company… Read more
