Global tax regulations have been more complicated recently, especially as countries try to stop tax-dodging tactics. The question of dual tax residence—where people try to claim residency in more than one jurisdiction, therefore benefiting from advantageous tax laws—is one of the main points of conflict. This is a significant issue in countries with large diaspora populations, including Portuguese descendants residing in South Africa, who typically try to balance residence claims between the two countries. Nevertheless, modern tax treaties and Common Reporting Standard (CRS) laws now greatly restrict these choices.
Tax Residency and Tax Treaty Rules
The location where people are required to pay taxes is mainly determined by the legal concept of tax residence. From a legal standpoint, taxpayers can only be regarded as residents of one jurisdiction at any point in time for tax reasons. Factors that shape this concept include the taxpayer’s permanent residence, where they spend most of their time, economic ties, and personal relationships.
International tax treaties between nations seek to eradicate situations whereby an individual might be regarded as a resident in more than one country, hence known as dual residence. Usually including “tie-breaker” procedures, these accords decide residency based on critical criteria such as nationality, habitual residence, and taxpayer centre of essential interests.
Claiming dual residence has been widespread among Portuguese descendants residing in South Africa. Under most tax treaties, however, taxpayers must pick one nation where they keep their tax residence. If South Africa is their primary home, they pay taxes there on their global income; money generated in Portugal might be taxed under particular treaty clauses. Such treaties guarantee taxpayers pay their fair share of taxes in the relevant jurisdiction, but their main objective is to avoid double taxation.
Common Reporting Standard (CRS) Rules
Particularly concerning tax residence, the CRS regulations developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have drastically changed the worldwide tax scene. These regulations force financial firms to automatically share information regarding foreign national-owned financial accounts with their home tax authorities. Since CRS removes the possibility of concealing revenue in foreign bank accounts, it is a potent weapon in spotting undeclared income and stopping tax evasion.
A Portuguese-descended taxpayer in South Africa, for instance, would be tempted to leave Portuguese-source income unreported while reporting just their South African income to the South African Revenue Service (SARS), therefore arguing that money should only be taxable in Portugal. Under the CRS, however, financial institutions in Portugal would notify the South African tax authorities of any income or assets owned by the taxpayer, making it difficult to conceal money obtained outside of South Africa.
Preventing Dual Residency and Ensuring Compliance
Together, the CRS guidelines and tax treaties help to avoid the manipulation of tax residence. Portuguese descendants and any other dual nationals are not currently eligible to claim dual residency in two countries to gain from favourable tax treatments. The automatic flow of financial data guarantees that Portugal and South Africa know the taxpayer’s worldwide income, promoting complete openness.
Taxpayers who try to take advantage of residency gaps by claiming to be residents in both nations run the legal danger in both countries as well as penalties and fines. The CRS has created an atmosphere where tax authorities have substantially more information to ensure compliance as the period of selective income reporting is nearing its conclusion.
Conclusion
Dual tax residence as a tax planning tactic is fast disappearing. Individuals trying to claim residency in several countries have fewer options for evasion since tax treaties guarantee that taxpayers must be residents of just one nation, and the CRS rules offer openness on worldwide income. Portuguese descendants residing in South Africa, in particular, have to understand this stringent regulatory environment in which complete reporting of global income is required is in force. Residency claims and reporting responsibilities are now under worldwide attention, so the future of tax compliance is obvious: non-compliance might have profound implications.
This “tax residency” article is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the content, laws and legal procedures can change, and the specifics of each case can vary widely. Therefore, readers are advised to consult a qualified professional or attorney in Portugal for advice tailored to their circumstances before taking action. This article does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, the authors, or the publishers. The authors and publishers are not liable for any actions taken or not taken based on the content of this article.
The founding of Madeira Corporate Services dates back to 1995. MCS started as a corporate service provider in the Madeira International Business Center and rapidly became a leading management company… Read more
